The Clearview fence and 358 fence are both types of high-security fences, often used for perimeter protection, but they have some key differences in design, security features, and applications:
1. Design:
• Clearview Fence:
• Known for its “clear view” design, which uses flat, welded wire panels. The design typically involves vertical and horizontal wires with minimal obstructions, providing clear visibility through the fence.
• It’s a simple, aesthetically pleasing option that offers good security while maintaining sightlines.
• 358 Fence:
• The 358 fence is often referred to as “prison mesh” because of its specific design. It consists of tightly spaced horizontal and vertical wires (usually 76.2mm x 12.7mm), creating a grid that is harder to climb.
• The fence is typically made of welded mesh panels with a more complex weave pattern, and the thickness of the wire is generally greater compared to a Clearview fence, making it more robust.
2. Security:
• Clearview Fence:
• Offers a balance of security and visibility. It’s difficult to climb due to the design of the wires, but it doesn’t offer the same level of anti-climb security as the 358.
• It’s often used in environments where visibility is important, such as in residential or low-security commercial settings.
• 358 Fence:
• Known for its high-security features, the 358 fence is much more difficult to climb due to the narrow mesh openings and robust materials. • The design and materials make it ideal for high-security applications, including prisons, military sites, airports, and other sensitive locations.
3. Climb Resistance:
• Clearview Fence:
• The spacing of the wires is designed to be narrow enough to deter climbing, but it’s generally not as climb-resistant as the 358 fence.
• 358 Fence:
• The 358 design, with its small mesh openings, makes it extremely difficult to climb. It’s commonly used where anti-climb features are crucial, and it’s even harder to cut through compared to Clearview.
4. Aesthetics:
• Clearview Fence:
• Generally considered more aesthetically pleasing because of the clean, unobtrusive design. It’s often used in urban settings where aesthetics matter but security is still important.
• 358 Fence:
• Less aesthetically pleasing due to the denser, more industrial design. It’s more utilitarian, meant to prioritize security over appearance.
5. Applications:
• Clearview Fence:
• Residential properties, low-security commercial areas, parks, and public spaces where visibility and security are important but not critical. • 358 Fence:
• High-security areas, including correctional facilities, airports, military installations, and industrial sites.
6. Cost: • Clearview Fence:
• Typically less expensive than the 358 due to the simpler design and lighter materials.
• 358 Fence:
• Tends to be more expensive because of the higher security features, stronger materials, and the more complex manufacturing process. Summary:
• Clearview fence is a versatile, aesthetically pleasing, and moderately secure option ideal for less critical applications.
• 358 fence is a high-security, anti-climb solution, commonly used in sensitive or high-risk areas. If security is your top priority, the 358 would be the better option. But if visibility and a clean design matter more, the Clearview fence might be the way to go.
